今年Google最值得你為它賣命

作者: Jas / 發表於 2007-02-03

沒錯,別老想著講Yahoo!的壞話,還是多吹捧一下大公司的美好,搞不好有機會可以進全球最值得你為它賣命的公司(或者起碼不致斷送美好前程的可能),譬如說:Google。

根據FORTUNE雜誌的2007年百大值得工作的公司調查評比專題,Google繼全球最具影響力的品牌之後,又拿下2007年最值得工作的公司頭銜。遠遠凌駕它的對手,包括排在第44位的Yahoo!及第50位的微軟。

這項調查評比專題的前百大公司名單如下:

  1. Google
  2. Genentech
  3. Wegmans Food Markets
  4. Container Store
  5. Whole Foods Market
  6. Network Appliance
  7. S.C. Johnson & Son
  8. Boston Consulting Grp.
  9. Methodist Hospital Sys.
  10. W.L. Gore & Associates
  11. Cisco Systems
  12. David Weekley Homes
  13. Nugget Market
  14. Qualcomm
  15. American Century Invest.
  16. Starbucks Coffee
  17. Quicken Loans
  18. Station Casinos
  19. Alston & Bird
  20. QuikTrip
  21. Griffin Hospital
  22. Valero Energy
  23. Vision Service Plan
  24. Nordstrom
  25. Ernst & Young
  26. Arnold & Porter
  27. Recreational Equip. (REI)
  28. Kimley-Horn & Assoc.
  29. Edward Jones
  30. Russell Investment Grp.
  31. Adobe Systems
  32. Plante & Moran
  33. Intuit
  34. Umpqua Bank
  35. Children's Healthcare of Atlanta
  36. Goldman Sachs
  37. Northwest Community Hospital
  38. Robert W. Baird
  39. J.M. Smucker
  40. Amgen
  41. JM Family Enterprises
  42. PCL Construction
  43. Genzyme
  44. Yahoo
  45. Bain & Co.
  46. First Horizon National
  47. American Fidelity Assur.
  48. SAS Institute
  49. Nixon Peabody
  50. Microsoft
  51. Stew Leonard's
  52. OhioHealth
  53. Four Seasons Hotels
  54. Baptist Health Care
  55. Dow Corning
  56. Granite Construction
  57. Publix Super Markets
  58. PricewaterhouseCoopers
  59. Pella
  60. MITRE
  61. SRA International
  62. Mayo Clinic
  63. Booz Allen Hamilton
  64. Perkins Coie
  65. Alcon Laboratories
  66. Jones Lang LaSalle
  67. HomeBanc Mortgage
  68. Procter & Gamble
  69. Nike
  70. Paychex
  71. AstraZeneca
  72. Medtronic
  73. Aflac
  74. American Express
  75. Quad/Graphics
  76. Deloitte & Touche USA
  77. Principal Financial Grp.
  78. Timberland
  79. TDIndustries
  80. Lehigh Valley Hospital & Health Ntwrk.
  81. Baptist Health S. Florida
  82. CDW
  83. EOG Resources
  84. Capital One Financial
  85. Standard Pacific
  86. National Instruments
  87. Texas Instruments
  88. CarMax
  89. Marriott International
  90. Men's Wearhouse
  91. Memorial Health
  92. Bright Horizons
  93. Milliken
  94. Bingham McCutchen
  95. Vanguard
  96. IKEA North America
  97. KPMG
  98. Synovus
  99. A.G. Edwards
  100. Stanley

看來是頗嚴謹的調查專題,樣本數為來自四百四十六家超過十萬五千人的受測者,在填寫過57題的問卷後,綜合分析得出的結果:

More than 105,000 employees from 446 companies responded to a 57-question survey created by Great Place to Work Institute®.

不大像台灣媒體慣用生成數據來背書炒作話題的操作,使得這項調查本身的諸多細節,似乎遠比Google拿下第一名或誰誰誰也入榜來得更有可觀的價值。Fortune雜誌也公開說明他們如何挑選出這一百家公司,我想,就一項嚴謹的調查專題而言,用以衡量的尺度和觀點,應該遠比結果更具啟發性才對。

不過,另一方面我好像也可以預見,當台灣的媒體或部落格獲知這樣的調查評比專題時,他們會怎麼來作眼看生不大不出意義的炒作。

technorati tag




回上方